Skip to content
BetterOpenSource

SigNoz vs OpenTelemetry

A side-by-side comparison of two open-source tools to help you choose the right one.

Feature
SummaryOpen-source observability in one app.Vendor-neutral observability for every stack.
GitHub stars23K5.4K
LicenseMITApache 2.0
LanguageGoGo
PricingFree & Open SourceFree & Open Source
Self-hostable
ReplacesDatadog, New RelicDatadog, New Relic
Rating4.5 / 54.8 / 5

SigNoz features

  • Metrics, traces, and logs together
  • OpenTelemetry-native ingestion
  • Application performance monitoring
  • Custom dashboards and alerts
  • Self-host to avoid per-host fees

OpenTelemetry features

  • Unified SDKs for traces, metrics, and logs in 11+ languages
  • OpenTelemetry Collector — a vendor-agnostic pipeline daemon
  • Auto-instrumentation for popular frameworks (Express, Spring, Django…)
  • Exporters for Prometheus, Jaeger, Zipkin, Grafana LGTM, and 50+ backends
  • W3C-standard trace context propagation across services

SigNozpros & cons

Pros

  • Unified observability, one tool
  • Standards-based via OpenTelemetry
  • Big cost savings vs SaaS APM

Cons

  • Uses ClickHouse, needs resources
  • Younger than incumbent tools

OpenTelemetrypros & cons

Pros

  • Zero vendor lock-in — switch backends without changing app code
  • CNCF-graduated project with massive adoption and community
  • Auto-instrumentation means minimal code changes

Cons

  • Collector setup and configuration has a learning curve
  • You still need a storage/visualization backend (e.g. Grafana + Tempo)

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...