Skip to content
BetterOpenSource

Continue vs Plandex

A side-by-side comparison of two open-source tools to help you choose the right one.

Feature
SummaryOpen-source autocomplete and chat for your IDE.A terminal AI agent for large, real-world projects.
GitHub stars24.5K13K
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
PricingFree & Open SourceFree & Open Source
Self-hostable
ReplacesGitHub Copilot, Claude CodeClaude Code
Rating4.6 / 54.5 / 5

Continue features

  • Tab autocomplete with any model
  • Inline edits and chat in your editor
  • Custom context providers (docs, repos, issues)
  • VS Code and JetBrains support
  • Local models via Ollama for full privacy

Plandex features

  • Massive context window for big codebases
  • Diff-review sandbox before applying changes
  • Smart context management to control cost
  • Version-controlled, reversible changes
  • Self-hostable server

Continuepros & cons

Pros

  • Highly customizable to your codebase
  • Works with local models for privacy
  • Cross-IDE support

Cons

  • Configuration depth has a learning curve
  • Best autocomplete needs a capable model

Plandexpros & cons

Pros

  • Designed for large, multi-step tasks
  • Careful review workflow before applying edits
  • MIT licensed and self-hostable

Cons

  • Terminal-first workflow
  • Large contexts can be token-expensive

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...