Skip to content
BetterOpenSource

Chatto vs Zulip

A side-by-side comparison of two open-source tools to help you choose the right one.

Feature
SummarySelf-hostable team & community chat.Threaded team chat that scales with focus.
GitHub stars89622K
LicenseAGPL 3.0Apache 2.0
LanguageGoPython
PricingFree & Open SourceFree & Open Source
Self-hostable
ReplacesSlack, Microsoft Teams, DiscordSlack, Discord
Rating4.6 / 54.5 / 5

Chatto features

  • Real-time messaging with channels for teams and communities
  • Built-in voice and video calls (powered by LiveKit)
  • Screen sharing during calls
  • Privacy-first and GDPR-compliant — data stays on your own servers
  • Self-host via standalone binary, Docker Compose, or Kubernetes

Zulip features

  • Topic-based threading within channels
  • Powerful search and keyboard navigation
  • Markdown, code blocks, and LaTeX
  • Integrations and incoming webhooks
  • Self-hosted or cloud

Chattopros & cons

Pros

  • Fully self-hostable — conversations and data never leave your infrastructure
  • Voice, video, and screen sharing built in, no third-party add-ons
  • Actively developed with frequent releases

Cons

  • Young project — early 0.x releases, so expect rapid changes
  • Managed cloud hosting isn't available yet (self-host only)
  • Smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations than Slack or Teams

Zulippros & cons

Pros

  • Best-in-class for async clarity
  • Excellent for large communities
  • Fully open and self-hostable

Cons

  • Threading model takes adjustment
  • UI is dense for newcomers

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...